Pro Audio Files

Why Atlanta’s Music Studio Ordinance Should Not Pass

The City of Atlanta is convening to discuss Ordinance 16-O-1454 on Thursday. This ordinance restricts any facility from being used to produce commercially viable sound recordings from existing without “requiring soundproofing and a minimum distance of 500 feet from residential uses.” Not without a special permit. It is evident even from the text of the legislation that no studio engineers were consulted before drafting this ordinance.

I am based in Los Angeles. But I am very much in touch with the Atlanta recording scene. The music world in Atlanta has a special legacy in this country. Unlike New York, Nashville, Miami, Chicago and Los Angeles, the beating heart of Atlanta’s music scene has always been a grassroots operation. There are very few major studios in Atlanta, but there are many smaller project studios and home studios. Together, these studios make Atlanta one of the big six cities, and one that will always be regarded with a certain nod — a place where a musical act can come out of their living room and put Atlanta on a worldwide stage.

There is an important distinction between a Noise Ordinance and a Zoning Ordinance. If the sound of Atlanta’s home studios is too loud, there is a volume knob just at arms length. If the existence of these studios were to require proper sound isolation, this would require tens of thousands of dollars and dozens of labor hours to complete. It is simply not plausible for the home recordist to follow the letter of this law and operate a home studio. This will be to the exclusivity of those who are already within means of constructing a studio, and the reality is that if the construction of commercial studios were truly viable there would be more of them.

The world of the music producer is one that starts from meager means. Almost everyone in my generation of music either began in a home studio, or currently operates in one. Even I, as an operator of a million dollar commercial facility, have a studio in my home. Because it is more economical. It allows me to conduct my business in a way that gives people who cannot afford studio fees to still afford: me.

I cannot fathom how detrimental this could be to the music community in Atlanta, and respectively to the music community as a whole. Please consider my words. I would not have the career I have today were it not for my ability to set up a home studio fifteen years ago.


Matthew Weiss

Missing our best stuff?

Sign up to be the first to learn about new tutorials, sales, giveaways and more.

We will never spam you. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit
Matthew Weiss

Matthew Weiss

Matthew Weiss is a Grammy nominated and Spellemann Award winning audio engineer from Philadelphia. Matthew has mixed songs for Snoop, Sonny Digital, Gorilla Zoe, Uri Caine, Dizzee Rascal, Arrested Development, 9th Wonder, !llmind & more. Get in touch:

Free Video on Mixing Low End

Download a FREE 40-minute tutorial from Matthew Weiss on mixing low end.

Powered by ConvertKit
  • max

    This sounds like somebody with enough money is pressuring the city (or whoever) to shut down smaller, less well-funded studios. regulations are how larger companies avoid competition, kind of the Regulations Golden Rule (Those that have the gold get to make the rules). This is exactly how taxi services work the system for their benefit as well.

  • They tried this once in L.A. when SPARS tried to stop engineers from putting studios in their homes. The big boys were losing money because people were tracking at home and not going to a “real” studio until they needed to mix and master. There’s no way to stop this. It you do a lot of overdubs and use an electronic drum set,no one will even know you’ve got a studio until you bring in the horns.It’s going to take neighbors ratting out artists who live in their neighborhood to even make a dent in home recording.. I can guarantee you it’s the big studios who are at the bottom of this.

/> /> /> /> /> /> /> /> /> />